THEETHICSOFARTIFICIALINTELLIGENCE

I am beginning a series exploring some ethical concerns associated with the development of artificial intelligence. Neurobiological evidence points firmly to the brain as the source of human intelligence. How exactly the features of consciousness are bound in this collection of neurons is unknown, but creating artificial intelligence can no longer be ruled out as an in principle impossibility (though its actual implementation may be a long way away).

We can for once anticipate the moral implications of advancing technology and begin to consider what our moral obligations are in this field.

iTuring Universal
Someone actually made one.

Inspired by a strange mix of relevant coursework and lots of Battlestar Galactica, I will try to answer the question of whether we (humans) should step aside and allow a more intelligent and moral artificial intelligence (of our own creation) to replace us. The series is divided into three parts:

  1. Is it ethical to create consciousness?
    • Creating artificial intelligence means creating a personal, subjective life. Can we create a being when we don’t know what their life would feel like?
  2. Is it ethical to allow humanity to continue, or to replace our species with machines?
    • Man is (perhaps irreparably) flawed. We fight and kill each other, and allow even more to die of starvation. If an alternative, more perfect intelligence can be created, do we have an obligation to replace ourselves with them?
  3. Is it ethical (or possible) to constrain intelligent life?
    • To what extent is humanity’s immorality the result of free will and ego? If we create intelligence intended to end the destructive behavior of humans, do we necessarily remove these individuating human features? What effect would this have on the unique, superhuman achievements of individuals that define (positively and negatively) humanity?

I fully expect the answers to each section to conflict, but it will be interesting to see how much each question weighs in producing the final answer.

  1. Very interested in this topic as it’s something I’ve put a lot of thought in to recently.

    A pertinent video discussing some of the meta trends (robotics, bio, humanity): http://www.ted.com/talks/juan_enriquez_shares_mindboggling_new_science.html

    Looking forward to seeing your thoughts!

    -Eric K

    Eric Kerr

    Apr 4, 12:13 PM #

  2. Cool video, thanks for the link Eric (I love TED).

    The first post is up, check it out.

    Thame

    Apr 5, 10:11 PM #

  3. As a programmer involved with neural networks, I have a plan to make self aware OS, based on multi layer neural net emulated on Linux kernel.
    I believe that thinking about ethical implications of such project is a complete waste of time.

    bluebird.i386

    Dec 6, 09:29 AM #

  4. I love this blog, thank you for writing it. Articifial intelligence and the ethics involved are really interesting.

    I don’t think it’s a waste of time, as said by bluebird. I agree with you on most points and I do question artificial intelligence as well. I think the movie “Bicentennial Man” portrayed it quite well (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0182789/ It’s not the best movie ever but it conveyed the idea that artificial intelligence has some ethical issues quite well imo).

    Manon Eileen

    Dec 28, 09:32 AM #

  5. I’ve been putting some thought in and on this topic, concernig the issue of war and AI. The ethical question being: are there implications for machines carrying out warfare against humans? Much to discuss.

    Carlos Carbajal

    Jan 4, 03:26 AM #

Add a Comment

Phrase modifiers:

_emphasis_
*strong*
__italic__
**bold**
??citation??
-deleted text-
@code@

Block modifiers:

bq. Blockquote
p. Paragraph

Links:

"linktext":http://example.com


Show Articles By:

You can show articles by time or category.

  • 260.

    Conscious Conversation: Behavioral Science

    Dr. Eran Zaidel is a professor of Behavioral Neuroscience and faculty member at the Brain Research Institute at UCLA. His work focuses on hemispheric specialization and interhemispheric interaction...

    Read More

  • 260.

    Progress Report

    Two years down, I’m still going. The next two years are my clinical rotations, the actual hands-on training. It’s a scary prospect, responsibilities and such; but it’s equally exciting, after...

    Read More

  • 260.

    Why Medical School Should Be Free

    There’s a lot of really great doctors out there, but unfortunately, there’s also some bad ones. That’s a problem we don’t need to have, and I think it’s caused by some problems with the...

    Read More

  • 260.

    The Cerebellum: a model for learning in the brain

    I know, it’s been a while. Busy is no excuse though, as it is becoming clear that writing for erraticwisdom was an important part of exercising certain parts of my brain that I have neglected...

    Read More

  • 260.

    Conscious Conversation: Philosophy

    Daniel Black, author of Erectlocution, was kind enough to chat with me one day and we had a great discussion – have a listen.

    Read More

  • 260.

    The Stuff in Between

    I’m actually almost normal when not agonizing over robot production details, and quite a bit has happened since I last wrote an update. First, I’ve finally graduated. I had a bit of a...

    Read More

  • 260.

    The Ethics of AI: Part Three

    Is it ethical (or possible) to constrain intelligent life? This part of the argument involves what we think it means to be human, and whether creating and adjusting those criteria in an AI affects...

    Read More

  • 260.

    The Ethics of AI: Part Two

    Is it ethical to allow humanity to continue, or to replace our species with machines? This is getting tougher. Why does humanity deserve to exist? The recorded history of the experiences of Homo...

    Read More