REFORMDIGG

Like countless others, one of the first websites I visit every day is digg.

Unfortunately, I am being tempted to move to a more professional source such as Newsvine because of the multitude of “DUdes check out thsi sweet googel video” stories that litter the homepage.

For example:

And my personal favorite:

The title of a digg story should be enticing and well-formed. It is not necessarily a place for smiley faces, ALL CAPITAL TITLES (you screamed that in your head, didn’t you), or thousands of exclamation marks. Feel free to actually read the article you are posting if necessary.

Also, the description is a crucial next-step for those who are somewhat attracted by the title but aren’t sure if it’s worth a click; therefore, descriptions that refer back to the title (i.e. “It’s all in the title!”) are useless. If you cannot effectively summarize the piece, a key excerpt can be useful.

I love digg as much as anyone else, but I cannot take it seriously unless its contributors do the same.

  1. You can’t take Digg seriously because you’re not SUPPOSED to take it seriously. It’s an almost totally unmoderated social aggregator, focused exclusively on science/tech/web news items. Digg is popular BECAUSE it lets the social, grammatically flawed personalities of its users seep through. Follow your own advice and use Newsvine if you want real news.

    Jonathan Dobres

    Mar 13, 06:27 PM #

  2. I agree with Jonathan.

    Jacob Wilson

    Mar 13, 11:28 PM #

  3. I too love digg. I cannot stand most the users though (probably 12 and under). Half the comments aren’t about the story itself but about how its not ‘tech’ or complaining about why people have dugg it so far. IF YOU DON’T LIKE IT MOVE ALONG! GEEZ it’s not that hard! That’s the point: If you like it DIGG IT if not DON’T. Thats the biggest turnoff for me. However with the new comment system we’re finally getting threaded comments going, starting up some deeper conversation (though I doubt it’ll ever get close to Slashdot’s)

    Kyle Jones

    Mar 13, 11:57 PM #

  4. If you hate stupid digg submissions, you’ll love or really, really hate our podcast, DiggCounty, which makes fun of them.

    http://diggcounty.com

    Clyde

    Mar 14, 08:17 AM #

  5. The reason I still go to digg is because it is so much quicker than Newsvine.

    Don’t get me wrong, I love the layout and idea of Newsvine, but nothing’s quicker than a list of top-rated links…

    Thame

    Mar 14, 04:00 PM #

  6. I agree with you, somewhat, but if people digg things onto the home page then surely that is what is popular.

    Also, that first example is a little harsh; everyone makes a typo or two and he spelt “theory” correctly below.

    Luke Labern

    Mar 15, 03:22 PM #

  7. Yeah, I guess I was a little rough on that first one. My point was that the submitter didn’t bother to read it before they confirmed that everything was correct.

    Thame

    Mar 15, 04:21 PM #

  8. I don’t love digg by any means. In fact, I kind of hate it. The amount of terrible stories is truly staggering. The comments are a severe detriment as well. Unfortunately, there are a lot of good stories on digg, too, and it’s a pretty quick hit of news. Covers a wide range of topics.

    Glen C.

    Mar 17, 10:27 PM #

  9. Glen: Yeah, that’s what I like about digg and what keeps me going there despite all the crap.

    Thame

    Mar 18, 03:45 PM #

  10. It helps to find friends on digg with similar interests.

    Feel free to add me: ThePhilomath

    Eric. I

    Mar 29, 05:37 PM #

  11. Done. You’re my first friend!

    Thame

    Mar 30, 08:53 AM #

Add a Comment

Phrase modifiers:

_emphasis_
*strong*
__italic__
**bold**
??citation??
-deleted text-
@code@

Block modifiers:

bq. Blockquote
p. Paragraph

Links:

"linktext":http://example.com


Show Articles By:

You can show articles by time or category.

  • 260.

    Conscious Conversation: Computation

    This interview is part of a series exploring what different people think about consciousness. The plan is to pose the same basic question to people of different backgrounds (philosophers, religious...

    Read More

  • 260.

    State of the Species

    My fellow humans, we’ve come a long way. Throughout our brief history on earth, we’ve tried to come to terms with a remarkable ability, its source, and what best to do with it. Through relatively...

    Read More

  • 260.

    Conscious Conversation: Science

    This interview is the first of a series exploring what different people think about consciousness. The plan is to pose the same basic question to people of different backgrounds (philosophers,...

    Read More

  • 260.

    On Subjectivity

    Science places a heavy emphasis on the objectivity of the physical world. As a result, consciousness, and specifically its subjective aspect, is often understandably ignored. What interests us is not...

    Read More

  • 260.

    Just Animated Stardust

    “Through science, we human beings are able to grasp at least some of nature’s secrets. We have cracked part of the cosmic code. Why this should be, just why Homo sapiens should carry the spark of...

    Read More

  • 260.

    Prodigious Savants and their Abilities

    Savant syndrome, a condition occurring most often in autistic patients, is a rare disorder where mentally retarded individuals have incredible abilities in isolated fields like memory, mathematics,...

    Read More

  • 260.

    Why Medicine Again?

    Medicine isn’t what it used to be. I’ve talked to alot of physicians, researchers and residents recently and I’m not encouraged by what I’ve heard. What seems to motivate many...

    Read More

  • 260.

    What of the Soul?

    I received a question recently that asked what I thought about the existence of a soul given the relative secularity of most of the content on this site. Soul, Mind, whatever you call it refers...

    Read More