Post
Just as a little disclaimer before I begin: I’m not chiming in as another Web 2.0 hater. I really do believe in the potential of the movement, it’s done a great deal to inform and excite the community about the future of the internet.
Now that I’ve (hopefully) taken care of violent commenters, let me explain what I think about the Web 2.0 movement. It seems to me that one of the main objectives of Web 2.0 and its associated “technologies” is to recreate the desktop interface and interactivity. The advanced animations and asynchronous requests are used to emulate an operating system environment where the user experiences an almost immediate response.
Let me give an example:
While at school one day, a friend was faced with the painful problem of connecting to AOL Instant Messenger without being able to download the program. Public site computers also blocked the major alternative – AIM Express – as a security risk. Therefore, I suggested meebo, an amazing Web 2.0, AJAX-powered instant messenging application that allows users to connect to all major chat programs right from their browser.
Meebo really is an amazing application, but my friend wasn’t able to use it for more than a few minutes. I described all the amazing features such as “window” resizing and movement, but they weren’t impressed. They kept citing what it couldn’t do and the somewhat more awkward interface that results from it being inside another window.
While meebo and other “Web 2.0” applications are clearly an enormous step forward in terms of web developement and transformation, to the average user, it was actually a step backwards. It is easy to appreciate the features of these new websites from the standpoint of a well-versed or even slightly knowledgable (in my case) web developer. Since the website emulates a desktop environment so well, the average user will treat it as such, causing some frustration when basic actions such as right-clicking, etc. do not have the expected result.
While the Web 2.0 movement may be working wonders within the community of web developers, by sparking new ideas and applications, the general public is still not ready – or, more precisely, Web 2.0 is not ready for the public. It is obviously a necessary transitional stage, as we cannot expect to leap directly into the Modern Web, but there is still alot of work left to do.
Archive
-
260.
Natural Kinds in Chemistry
One of my favorite courses so far was last semester’s “Natural Kinds”. Everything from the unique subject matter to the seminar-like structure made the class a blast, up until the...
-
260.
The Phenomen- ology of Freedom
Are we truly free? Are the paths of our lives charted beforehand, or is every moment an opportunity to break new ground? The answer isn’t easily found, the determinate physical world seems to hit a...
-
260.
An Open Letter to God.
So here’s the deal, we’ve been here a while doing great things and…eh things, but there’s always been that trickling or gushing concern about why. We’re amazing, when you stop to think...
-
260.
Nietzsche: The Fast Track
The darkly dressed student made yet another existentially pessimistic remark and the professor unleashed one of the harsher insults I’ve heard: “Every student goes: Nietzsche, Schopenhauer,...
-
260.
Computers and God
I came across an interesting presentation on digg (and surprisingly, it wasn’t a kitten with horrifying spelling/grammar) recently that compared – albeit often fallaciously – our...
-
260.
Surviving Life
The questions we ask are not ones we can ponder in our free time and easily set aside when there’s life to do. What am I? Am I free? What is the purpose of my existence? Why should I strive to...
-
260.
The New Erratic Wisdom
Another semester, another redesign (give it a solid refresh to clear your cache). This one’s been brewing for quite some time now, with the notched grid motif coming around a few months ago,...
-
260.
Imperfect Art
Plato’s metaphysics and his Doctrine of Forms describes a general division of our universe into forms and particulars. Forms are instantiated by contingent particulars. That is, particulars are...




















Comments
I think as time goes by, we’ll see the rise of applications that simply make more sense when deployed over the web, and that will make all the difference. It stands to reason, perhaps, that an AIM-like client doesn’t make as much sense over the web as it does in stand-alone form.
Chris
Nov 20, 12:23 PM #
the difference is that u can use your chatting accounts even without the client and with standard chat port closed by firewall..
Baldo
Nov 21, 04:53 PM #
Add a Comment
Phrase modifiers:
_emphasis_
*strong*
__italic__
**bold**
??citation??
-
deleted text-@code@Block modifiers:
bq. Blockquote
p. Paragraph
Links:
"linktext":http://example.com