Post
Natural Kinds in Chemistry
One of my favorite courses so far was last semester’s “Natural Kinds”. Everything from the unique subject matter to the seminar-like structure made the class a blast, up until the final paper was due.
Never one to procrastinate (cough), I got started early and buried myself in the literature. I was on the hunt for a good topic, something I could sink into to keep the required twenty pages tightly focused. I ended up – not surprisingly – back in the sciences, studying natural kinds in chemistry.
I worked feverishly in the final weeks and was rather proud of the finished paper. So, with some encouragement I submitted it to the department’s scholarship program, and was surprised to learn that I won.
The paper is long, probably pretty dull, and in such a tiny niche that I’d only recommend it for someone with at least a bit of experience in the area. For some support material, Natural kinds and the seminal works of Kripke and Putnam.
Archive
-
260.
The Ethics of Practicing Procedures on the Nearly Dead
The report from the field was not promising by any stretch, extensive trauma, and perhaps most importantly unknown “downtime” (referencing the period where the patient received no basic care like...
-
260.
The Ethics of Teaching Hospitals
I can’t imagine what the patient was thinking. Seeing my trembling hands approaching the lacerations on his face with a sharp needle. I tried to reassure him that I knew what I was doing, but the...
-
260.
Conscious Conversation: Behavioral Science
Dr. Eran Zaidel is a professor of Behavioral Neuroscience and faculty member at the Brain Research Institute at UCLA. His work focuses on hemispheric specialization and interhemispheric interaction...
-
260.
Progress Report
Two years down, I’m still going. The next two years are my clinical rotations, the actual hands-on training. It’s a scary prospect, responsibilities and such; but it’s equally exciting, after...
-
260.
Why Medical School Should Be Free
There’s a lot of really great doctors out there, but unfortunately, there’s also some bad ones. That’s a problem we don’t need to have, and I think it’s caused by some problems with the...
-
260.
The Cerebellum: a model for learning in the brain
I know, it’s been a while. Busy is no excuse though, as it is becoming clear that writing for erraticwisdom was an important part of exercising certain parts of my brain that I have neglected...
-
260.
Conscious Conversation: Philosophy
Daniel Black, author of Erectlocution, was kind enough to chat with me one day and we had a great discussion – have a listen.
-
260.
The Stuff in Between
I’m actually almost normal when not agonizing over robot production details, and quite a bit has happened since I last wrote an update. First, I’ve finally graduated. I had a bit of a...
Comments
Looks like I am the first to comment, which is very unusual for this blog on a post which is several days old. I hope this doesn’t mean I was the only one up to the challenge of reading a 20 page college essay on kinds!
That being said, I did read your essay, it was quite well done.
I had never really thought about the subject of “kinds” nor did I know it was a major area of controversy. I majored in engineering and never once heard anything on the subject.
It was a bit interesting but left me wondering, who cares? Not to say, who cares about your essay, but to say, who cares to study on and debate such a subject. I am assuming it was assigned reading, and course material in your case. As for the authors of the cited books, I am at a loss.
I always felt of kinds, such as gold, tigers, and hydrogen to be items understood by the people you are discussing them with for what they are. A consequence of language. Why is identifying different “kinds” so important?
Bryan Chain
Jul 22, 11:08 PM #
Thanks for reading it. I can’t say I’m surprised about the limited response, I don’t think I can read it again.
Honestly, I found myself asking the same question when I was in the class. The literature we were reading was often so tedious, both conceptually and terminologically, that I felt the authors had just lost their minds. I still don’t know if this justifies the almost complete lack of practical applications, but the topic does combine a bunch of interesting fields. There’s stuff in there in the philosophy of mind, language, sense, reference, and everything in between. Studying why and how we use natural kinds could be a huge breakthrough into understanding the way our minds work.
Thame
Jul 23, 06:48 AM #
Add a Comment
Phrase modifiers:
_emphasis_
*strong*
__italic__
**bold**
??citation??
-
deleted text-@code@Block modifiers:
bq. Blockquote
p. Paragraph
Links:
"linktext":http://example.com