Post
One of my favorite courses so far was last semester’s “Natural Kinds”. Everything from the unique subject matter to the seminar-like structure made the class a blast, up until the final paper was due.
Never one to procrastinate (cough), I got started early and buried myself in the literature. I was on the hunt for a good topic, something I could sink into to keep the required twenty pages tightly focused. I ended up – not surprisingly – back in the sciences, studying natural kinds in chemistry.
I worked feverishly in the final weeks and was rather proud of the finished paper. So, with some encouragement I submitted it to the department’s scholarship program, and was surprised to learn that I won.
The paper is long, probably pretty dull, and in such a tiny niche that I’d only recommend it for someone with at least a bit of experience in the area. For some support material, Natural kinds and the seminal works of Kripke and Putnam.
Archive
-
260.
Conscious Conversation: Computation
This interview is part of a series exploring what different people think about consciousness. The plan is to pose the same basic question to people of different backgrounds (philosophers, religious...
-
260.
State of the Species
My fellow humans, we’ve come a long way. Throughout our brief history on earth, we’ve tried to come to terms with a remarkable ability, its source, and what best to do with it. Through relatively...
-
260.
Conscious Conversation: Science
This interview is the first of a series exploring what different people think about consciousness. The plan is to pose the same basic question to people of different backgrounds (philosophers,...
-
260.
On Subjectivity
Science places a heavy emphasis on the objectivity of the physical world. As a result, consciousness, and specifically its subjective aspect, is often understandably ignored. What interests us is not...
-
260.
Just Animated Stardust
“Through science, we human beings are able to grasp at least some of nature’s secrets. We have cracked part of the cosmic code. Why this should be, just why Homo sapiens should carry the spark of...
-
260.
Prodigious Savants and their Abilities
Savant syndrome, a condition occurring most often in autistic patients, is a rare disorder where mentally retarded individuals have incredible abilities in isolated fields like memory, mathematics,...
-
260.
Why Medicine Again?
Medicine isn’t what it used to be. I’ve talked to alot of physicians, researchers and residents recently and I’m not encouraged by what I’ve heard. What seems to motivate many...
-
260.
What of the Soul?
I received a question recently that asked what I thought about the existence of a soul given the relative secularity of most of the content on this site. Soul, Mind, whatever you call it refers...


















Comments
Looks like I am the first to comment, which is very unusual for this blog on a post which is several days old. I hope this doesn’t mean I was the only one up to the challenge of reading a 20 page college essay on kinds!
That being said, I did read your essay, it was quite well done.
I had never really thought about the subject of “kinds” nor did I know it was a major area of controversy. I majored in engineering and never once heard anything on the subject.
It was a bit interesting but left me wondering, who cares? Not to say, who cares about your essay, but to say, who cares to study on and debate such a subject. I am assuming it was assigned reading, and course material in your case. As for the authors of the cited books, I am at a loss.
I always felt of kinds, such as gold, tigers, and hydrogen to be items understood by the people you are discussing them with for what they are. A consequence of language. Why is identifying different “kinds” so important?
Bryan Chain
Jul 23, 02:08 AM #
Thanks for reading it. I can’t say I’m surprised about the limited response, I don’t think I can read it again.
Honestly, I found myself asking the same question when I was in the class. The literature we were reading was often so tedious, both conceptually and terminologically, that I felt the authors had just lost their minds. I still don’t know if this justifies the almost complete lack of practical applications, but the topic does combine a bunch of interesting fields. There’s stuff in there in the philosophy of mind, language, sense, reference, and everything in between. Studying why and how we use natural kinds could be a huge breakthrough into understanding the way our minds work.
Thame
Jul 23, 09:48 AM #
Add a Comment
Phrase modifiers:
_emphasis_
*strong*
__italic__
**bold**
??citation??
-
deleted text-@code@Block modifiers:
bq. Blockquote
p. Paragraph
Links:
"linktext":http://example.com