Post
God & Biology
What is one to do? Living in a household and society of deep (and often unfounded) faith, I find myself incredibly confused. A part of me desperately wants the comfort of ultimately handing my life over to something bigger while the rest finds the primal challenges and hopeless end simpler.
My problems were not aided by a book I recently received title the Philosophy of Biology. The book explains, by combining excerpts from key writings, various areas of both biology and philosophy. Needless to say, I jumped right to the “God & Biology” section. First comes an excerpt from the First Book of Moses, called Genesis detailing the early days of earth and the human race. The book continues with the text of the verdict from the Scopes Trial and an interesting essay titled “Creation Science: The Ultimate Fraud” which quite systematically – and convincingly, for me – debunks various Creationist claims. The essay cites discoveries such as Archaeoptryx and dating evidence which places the earth’s age far beyond what can be deduced from the Bible.
I do not mean to attack any particular religion, but I am searching for something: for those who are like me – confused – what is it?
Archive
-
260.
The Ethics of Practicing Procedures on the Nearly Dead
The report from the field was not promising by any stretch, extensive trauma, and perhaps most importantly unknown “downtime” (referencing the period where the patient received no basic care like...
-
260.
The Ethics of Teaching Hospitals
I can’t imagine what the patient was thinking. Seeing my trembling hands approaching the lacerations on his face with a sharp needle. I tried to reassure him that I knew what I was doing, but the...
-
260.
Conscious Conversation: Behavioral Science
Dr. Eran Zaidel is a professor of Behavioral Neuroscience and faculty member at the Brain Research Institute at UCLA. His work focuses on hemispheric specialization and interhemispheric interaction...
-
260.
Progress Report
Two years down, I’m still going. The next two years are my clinical rotations, the actual hands-on training. It’s a scary prospect, responsibilities and such; but it’s equally exciting, after...
-
260.
Why Medical School Should Be Free
There’s a lot of really great doctors out there, but unfortunately, there’s also some bad ones. That’s a problem we don’t need to have, and I think it’s caused by some problems with the...
-
260.
The Cerebellum: a model for learning in the brain
I know, it’s been a while. Busy is no excuse though, as it is becoming clear that writing for erraticwisdom was an important part of exercising certain parts of my brain that I have neglected...
-
260.
Conscious Conversation: Philosophy
Daniel Black, author of Erectlocution, was kind enough to chat with me one day and we had a great discussion – have a listen.
-
260.
The Stuff in Between
I’m actually almost normal when not agonizing over robot production details, and quite a bit has happened since I last wrote an update. First, I’ve finally graduated. I had a bit of a...
Comments
Andrew
Jun 21, 08:12 PM #
Thame
Jun 21, 08:23 PM #
Jon Henshaw
Jun 21, 08:47 PM #
arturo
Jun 21, 09:24 PM #
But your question seems to be, “what religion?” There I’m afraid I’m going to seem less than helpful.
I hope at 18 you find yourself just at the beginning of a long love of wisdom, but I am certain you must have found by now that if you read any great philosopher and find no fault in their work, you probably need to reread it. If this is true for “the love of wisdom”, shouldn’t the same go (double?) for the worship of a higher power (or, if you prefer, Higher Power)? Because you cannot agree entirely with one philosopher’s writings does not mean you can not learn from them. Because you cannot accept on faith everything a relgious group says does not mean you cannot learn from their faith.
Religions are communities of faith. If you can’t accept anything on faith, ask yourself why you are seeking comfort in religion. Without faith, religion is a set of stories and practices with no cohesion.
What I find interesting, as one who has faith (somedays more than others), is that it doesn’t have to be my own religion to be comforting. I really enjoyed studying various religions in college and I think I am more comfortable with my own because of it.
Some religious leaders have cautioned against “buffet-style” religion. I say, what’s wrong with a buffet?
My personal relationship with God is rather informal, but I take a great deal of comfort in the ritual of the Catholic Church.
This is not to say you have to subscribe to an organized religion. (I’ll skip the sectarian humor about relative organization.) You can rely on your personal relationship with God. You have to acknowledge that community is powerful, though, and we all need a little help now and then.
Here I transition from philosophy and religion to biology and psychology. Intending not the slightest condesention, if your 18 and suffering a crisis of faith, that’s good. Hopefully you are having a crisis of consience, and a political epiphany, and an awakening to music and art, and are seriously examining your lifestyle, too. These are consequences of spiritual and intellectual growth. Don’t get discouraged, if the questions were easy, we’d have settled this by now. It’s not just okay to question your faith, worry when you stop seeking the answers.
Eric
Jun 21, 10:45 PM #
I would be interested in your comments.
Bishop Rick
Jun 21, 11:03 PM #
It might be helpful to observe that, just because you stop believing in God, that doesn’t mean you no longer have faith in Christianity. Christianity is not just belief in God, its a complete metaphysical system that defines and interprets an individual’s life, from before birth until after death. You’ve challenged and rejected the existence of God, but you still believe in the system of thought that only exists to support and justify belief in God, and doesn’t make sense without that final puzzle piece. In fact, without the final conclusion/first assumption that God exists, the whole thing is quite depressing.
Atheists make a big deal about whether God exists, but I think what really matters is if you accept Christian metaphysics. By way of contrast, there are a number of positions and theologies that are technically theistic, such as Spinoza’s pantheism, but rely on vastly different metaphysics, which don’t rely on supernatural beliefs. I suggest learning about those to realize that Christian beliefs go much further than just believing in God.
Mike
Jun 21, 11:08 PM #
Jon:
That sounds like an interesting book. Maybe I should have clarified somewhere that I’m not Christian but I think the problems are similar across all religiouns so I’ll try to get a hold of that book.
arturo:
I knew it!
Eric:
Thank you so much. It’s comforting to know that I’m simply experiencing a phase like any other. I’m not sure how I will be when I exit it but in any case I think I will learn something about myself and how I want to live my life.
Bishop Rick:
That’s an interesting site and I’ll definitely be subscribing (espicially if you flesh out those interesting stubs :D).
Mike:
That’s a really great point. I definitely associate religion as dealing entirely with god so it’s interesting to look at it from a different point-of-view.
Thame
Jun 22, 04:35 PM #
Ok, now that I have gotten that out of the way…
Your search seems to be the natural search for Truth, a desire we all share regardless of race, creed, or evolutionary state. For every one book that attempts to disprove religion there are others that claim to prove it. Case in point, “Misquoting Jesus” relies heavily on the writings of the Gnostic Gospels, claiming early scribes ruined the authenticity of the Bible by purposely leaving out Gnostic writings. However “Canon of Scripture” by Fredrick Fyvie Bruce argues that the Bible we hold in our hands today contains essentially the same text as what the Christians had in the second century.
Who does one believe? How can I judge which book, or religion, is right and which is wrong?
While it is true that the essence of Christianity is based on faith (I have really pissed off God, but lucky that Jesus fellow took my punishment and let the crap get kicked out of him so that I wouldn’t have to, and all I have to do is honestly say I’m sorry and thank you) it is not irrational and unreasonable. The scientific debate over Genesis does not disprove the Bible as much as it challenges the popular interpretation of how scholars have attempted to date the earth. Evolution currently does not have an answer for the Cambrian Era, where vast quantities of highly evolved fossils suddenly appear without their previous evolutionary stages, nor does it explain the Anthropic Principal, the forces that sustain life in the universe are so precise that if one were off by the smallest measurement, life could not exist.
If you are searching for what is “truth” can I recommend that you study sources that support a topic, because in doing so you can use your rational mind to determine if what you are reading is consistent, reasonable, rational, and true. When you read a book whose stated purpose is to disprove an idea or opinion you will more often than not be reading simple straw man arguments.
For Christian Apologetics I would recommend anything by Cornelius Van Til.
http://www.vantil.info/
For who Christians are, what we believe, and how we relate to God, and the piece/joy that results, I would recommend anything by John Piper.
http://www.desiringgod.org/
PS. As a software developer, whose preferred development environment is ANYTHING but Windows, I love the photo’s of the Mac stuff on this page.
Brian
Jun 23, 08:26 AM #
http://www.oneplace.com/ministries/let_my_people_think/Archives.asp
(Note: The above speaker is a Christian)
Allen Mercer
Jun 23, 02:59 PM #
Conn
Jun 24, 05:16 AM #
They shit their pants, just like everyone else.
Tim McCormack
Jun 24, 07:39 PM #
Brian: You make some very interesting points about the Cambrian explosion and Anthropic Principal, I obviously need to look at both sides. Thanks for giving me somewhere to start.
Also, I’m glad you liked the Mac pics. I’ll try to add some more. Maybe even some OS switching fun :D
Allen Mercer: Good point Allen. Like I mentioned, I should definitely be more even with my research.
Conn & Tim: I think dying is going to solve alot of these questions I’m having.
Thame
Jun 25, 08:41 PM #
As for people who say their God is better than the God of another religion, it’s the same God! Otherwise I could start a new religion tomorrow and there would be a new God.
I think you’ll find the eastern religions to be very open in allowing you to believe and worship as you wish, but then there’s no need to associate yourself with a religion to believe in God.
Atul
Jun 26, 11:51 AM #
Science and religion are competing forces, they declare a monopoly over truth — whether there is such a thing I don’t honestly think actually matters — and set forth their view of it.
I don’t believe in creationism because I don’t need to – aside from the fact that it seems utterly absurd to me. I believe some of the things science offers, because they are more probable, but in the end science is a creation of man. It can be argued that science alike religion, invents and not really discovers anything. Religion and science are ultimately, and quite honestly, interpretations reached through the deeply biased eye of man.
We cannot take things too seriously. Religion takes itself too seriously and herein lies its flaws. Science too takes itself seriously believing in ‘objectivity’.
I think the situation is that you have a desire for something — e.g., belief — and ultimately you will find that which you seek and be content with it — one hopes. Belief offers comfort… truth or the quest for ‘truth’ is a a road of suffering and pain.
In the end we all reach the same destination.
Juan
Jun 27, 02:44 PM #
I have been on the “path” for about 15 years now and started much like yourself… with a lot of questions. I started off trying out Christianity as we know it today and I refused to believe that I was suppose to throw out my questions on the belief that they were “wrong” or that I lacked faith. I believed that I had more faith because I wanted to keep searching instead of giving up. My journey has taken me in some great and interesting areas. I do believe I have found truth finally and all I can say is that there is a common thread among all religions and when you find it you will know it’s truth. You have to realize that all religions started as the 7 philosophies of the earth to bring people into communities. We had to have a common belief to come together to begin our evolution of society and internal growth. The reason religion was used for this is because we are all part of and ARE God as soul and spirit so we naturally are drawn to looking for something beyond the physical.
If you want direction, go within. Learn to meditate as Jesus, Mohammed, Buddha, etc. have done. When you start having “inner experiences” you will realize what was written in the Bible and other religious books. It is all about the Masters of the past and metaphors for their inner experiences. Read books written by the mystics that have had high experiences themselves. If you manage to find a copy, read the Mystic Bible. Find anything on the science of the Soul. The truth is out there, but it’s hidden to the common person because most aren’t ready for it. They are still at the stage where they would rather be lead than to find their own path. The people that are high up in the chuches know this truth as I have witnessed it myself.
It all leads to God and when you find the truth you will not settle for anything else and nobody can tell you otherwise. Keep looking, but the answer is in spirituality, not religion, although God works in great ways within religions as well. It’s all necessary to fill the need of each individual. Just don’t ever quit searching. It’s part of who you are… and with that I will leave you with my two favorite quotes…
“They say religion is for people who are afraid to go to Hell, and spirituality is for those that have been there.”
-Unknown
“I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use.” – Galileo Galilei
God bless.
Jonathan
Jun 29, 09:17 AM #
You’re very right, I think that finding a personal way to believe in god is much…cleaner as I wouldn’t have to worry about the politics that have likely scarred every religion (although you’re right about Eastern religions being less affected).
Juan:
Hello Juan,
I am probably looking for something that cannot be a part of a religion…or science. But what will I find, I have not really considered that this thing could be found elsewhere.
Jonathan:
Thanks for stopping by, and remember, anyone can have, at least erratic words of….forget it :)
Thank you for your help, I have tried and continue to meditate but I must say my experiences have been becoming increasingly less profound. Perhaps I am not focusing well enough, but I remember much more moving experiences only a couple months ago. I will definitely try to revive my efforts as I recall it was a fascinating experience.
Also, thanks for the book suggestions, I’ll try to get a hold of them.
Thame
Jul 1, 08:05 PM #
If you ever decide to go on the search for a teacher keep in mind that if they require money for any reason then they are stuck in a lower energy. You can still learn from them, but know there are higher teachers to find. I think that’s enough for now. Feel free to email me if you would like. I love to help in any way I can. I know all this works from experience, so I feel very confident sharing this with you.
Good night and God bless.
Jonathan
Jul 1, 11:33 PM #
Juan
Jul 2, 09:38 AM #
Title: The Creation of the Universe
Author: Harun Yahya
ISBN : 1-894264-38-X
best,
anonymous
Jul 2, 02:57 PM #
Juan: Good, that’s what I wanted to hear :)
anonymous: That looks interesting. I guess I have alot of reading to do.
Thame
Jul 2, 04:29 PM #
BawangMerah
Jul 5, 03:28 AM #
I am not a philosopher so this will not, I hope, be metaphysical and “deep” sounding. To draw from many of the other posts, you are on a search for the truth. It is actully easy to find. For this I draw on another of the above comments. Read the Bible, cover to cover, using a copy that is not annotated. Whle you are in this process, do not bother reading other comments either.
You see, the truth is not a vague statement, but is God. God has elected to allow us a peek into His life and kingdom. That peak comes via the Bible. I have to disagree with one of the early comments about being able to follow Christianity with God (or at least that is the way I read the post. You see Christianity is Christ. He is the Creator. He can do whatever He likes. What He desires is that we believe on Him by faith—not by fact. As such, He allows us to use science to “prove” whatever our heart desires. The same is true for other religions. The Bible is the history of the struggle of man-made relgions against God.
Your post demonstrates this struggle. You want to know answers and you apparently don’t really want a God to tell you mankind is wrong. Allow the Bible to speak to your heart. Ignore all of the comments of those who would divert you from the truth. This is not about whether creationism is right and evolution is wrong. It is about God’s existence and His directions for the life of men. In the end, you will answer to God whether you believe in Him or not. If you do not give Him a chance in the first instance, how will you expect to benefit when you come face to face with Him?
James G Arthur
Jul 5, 04:24 AM #
Ted Sbardella
Jul 5, 06:32 AM #
Anyways, I think typing that out helped me clarify some things (Funny how you don’t know how to put because you’ve never said it aloud). You have to put forth an effort to seek Christ. It’s the whole sowing and reaping thing. Sow some effort to understand Christ, reap a crop of understanding through Him. Take care.
Burton Posey
Jul 5, 11:12 AM #
Litel Macster
Jul 5, 11:34 AM #
James: I think you did a great job of boiling down my problem. While I may have been complaining about Creationism in this article, I think you’re right in saying that my issue runs deeper. I need help :)
Ted Sbardella: That’s an excellent analogy. It reminds me of something a professor talked about in the Bhagavad Gita.
Litel Macster: Good point. Perhaps I should have worded things differently. It is difficult to leap over ‘science’ and believe in God.
Thame
Jul 5, 06:14 PM #
Your own path to spiritual enlightenment, which is a separate endeavor from science. No one can dictate it; no one can indoctrinate it; no one can describe it. Spirituality and science are two entirely different things. Treated as such, they co-exist very peacefully.
Spiritual answers come from within. I’m convinced (and so have been all the great teachers) that the path to God lies with each individual soul.
Christianity: “Personal” relationship with God. (Forget the ‘died for our sins’, TV evangelist stuff. Jesus never said that.)
Buddhism: Oneness with the Cosmos
Hinduism: We each contain a divine spark. Together we make up part of a much larger whole.
Science explains ‘how’ the physical universe works. ‘Why’ is the province of God. At least I think so….
I’m sure He’ll let us know the answers to everything we are unable to either discover or understand ourselves. We’re still quite young to take it all in, no?
As for creationism, it is nothing more than shaky faith. Some people (for some ungodly reason) feel threatened by scientific discovery, as if scientific knowledge somehow denies (or, perhaps, treads upon) the existence of God himself (or His territory)... or is it their’s they’re worried about? Hmmm….
Pretty sure He’s not worried about it at all. “I am.”
Science seeks and reveals the method or machinations by which physical reality is governed, but not its reason for being. Science isn’t concerned with that aspect at all. Spirituality – a life-long, personal journey of discovery – covers a completely different realm of existence.
Could be wrong. Sorry if that sounds like a rant. It’s actually just my very quick two cents. :)
Lori
Jul 5, 07:59 PM #
The first is that to a person of faith who believes fully, without a doubt, in the precepts of his or her religion, science should never pose a threat to their fate.
Science describes WHAT the world is and HOW it works. Religion does this as well, but also deals with the fundamental question of WHY. Science is a practice of observing nature and deriving general principles from that observation, principles that are ever-changing, while religion teaches principles from G-d that never change.
Through this perspectives, no scientific find can shake my faith in anything I know from my religion—mainly because science doesn’t actually prove anything. The two are not a contest. Further differences include the fact that Religion teaches ho to live your life, while science teaches you about the nature of the world.
These ststements are clumsy and very, very far from encompassing, but I hope they’re somewhat helpful.
Hyde
Jul 7, 12:04 PM #
God bless you!
Richard Chuo
Jul 8, 03:37 PM #
Also, take note of Brian’s language regarding the Cambrian Explosion and the Anthropic principles: there is the conflation of incompleteness to relative impotency. That is, it should be accepted that a theory will be almost certainly incomplete in some manner, but that does not necessarily preclude its power of explanation. I admit I’ve never read the Bible, nor am I particularly well-versed in Biblical or other religious teaching; but I’ve never heard tell of their successful explanation of either of those historical phenomena, either.
Remember those multiple choice questions that had more than one potentially correct answer, from which you were to pick the best answer? Welcome to life.
Daniel
Jul 10, 02:19 PM #
my simple answer would be to just pick up the Bible and start reading it. read with a very open mind. Be will to accept and even challenge what you are reading. Also remember that the bible is THE most hyperlinked document in existense. Almost all the books are connected in someway.
check it out. You can start here:
www.ebible.com
Yorkali
Yorkali
Jul 10, 10:52 PM #
I stumbled across this guy on google video, his name is Kent Hovind and he has some great arguments for creation.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8141887480656996234&q=kent+hovind
As you will see, there is no real competition between biblical teaching and science. Incompatibilities only arise when science starts to make claims that are not based in fact, or are total fabrications (lies).
Ryan
Jul 17, 08:33 AM #
When reading the Bible (or any other ancient literature) it’s important to keep in mind the author(s) frame of reference. Were the author(s) of Genesis really concerned with Scientific Method? Probably not. The Bible’s primary purpose is to communicate humanities relationship with God.
Likewise, the Scientific Method is somewhat limited in it’s ability to ‘test’ what would be considered ‘spiritual’ or religious.
It’s unfortunate that each side feels they have to attack each other, rather than determining how each discipline might inform the other.
While I understand your question isn’t concerning Christianity or the Bible specifically, should you have any ‘bibley’ related inquiries in the future feel free to shoot me an email. I’ll try to make it short and sweet as it seems you’re got plenty to read!
For what it’s worth, I am a practicing Christian.
..also, please read Bart Erhman’s text with a pinch of salt. His research is solid, but his personal conclusions are misguided. He began as a hxc christian fundamentalist and now carries quite a chip on his shoulder – imho.
Scott Lenger
Jul 18, 10:10 PM #
I expect that it is the very fact that the logical inquiry which underpins the scientific method cannot hope to assail “spiritual” claims that is the point of its application to “spiritual” claims. That is, the scientist claims no special domain over logical scrutiny, but rather expects that logical scrutiny would be the foundation upon which any person would make assertions. Given that any discussion of god is generally held to be outside the realm of logical scrutiny, it is therefore outside not only the scientist’s range but the range of any person as well. It therefore fits in with U.F.O.’s and ghosts and all other manner of agent, entity, or phenomenon for which there can be no gathering of evidence (strictly technical or merely observational).
I find that the scientific method, or more basic logical scrutiny, is far more often employed to disassemble assertions of the existence of one or more god(s) rather than to actually assert nonexistence of such. The blood can really boil when incomplete bits of scientific results are paraded as either proof of one or more gods or proof against scientific theory.
Daniel
Jul 21, 03:45 PM #
D3NIS
Jul 25, 09:20 AM #
Indeed, poetry and science are valid, and our world is rich with the existence of both. I struggle with questions, too, and I find comfort in making peace with the questions, and living a life with Love as the main motivation.
Ebeth
Jun 25, 01:16 PM #
Dear Tom,
I believe that you are intelligently questioning the existence of God and you will only have your answer when you become stirred enough to hear from God himself and He will answer you or anyone else who seeks Him with all their heart., otherwise faith is required.
Tom, this is a quote from the Bible and speaks to how God will answer you.”…anyone who comes to me must first believe that I am and that I am a rewarder of those who dilgently seek me.” Go ahead Tom…go and get your reward, He will not fail to live up to His word!
Dave
Jun 26, 01:55 PM #
Add a Comment
Phrase modifiers:
_emphasis_
*strong*
__italic__
**bold**
??citation??
-
deleted text-@code@
Block modifiers:
bq. Blockquote
p. Paragraph
Links:
"linktext":http://example.com