Post
Activation Synthesis
One of the most interesting areas of psychology is dreams. While there are many theories about the purpose of dreams, one of the most fascinating (and strongest philosophical implications) is the activation synthesis theory.
The theory basically states that our dreams are products of random neural activity during REM sleep that is converted into plausible stories usually based on the day’s events.
Our brains are constantly reconstructing and synthesizing things from external stimuli to create the complete effect we are familiar with. For example, our brain fills in the blind spot that results from the rod and cone-free part of the retina where the optic nerve connects to the back of the eye.
What is interesting about the activation synthesis theory of dreams is that entire situations are synthesized with very little preliminary information. Other forms of reconstruction rely heavily on simultaneously-perceived stimuli to “fill in the gaps” whereas these dreams would be only loosely based on recent events with the remainder of the in-dream sensations being synthesized by the brain.
The prospect that complex and “realistic” sensations (such as in lucid dreams) could be fabrications of our brains is both amazing and alarming. If our dreams can be completely artificial, what else is simply our brain’s interpretation of random activity?
Archive
-
260.
The Ethics of Practicing Procedures on the Nearly Dead
The report from the field was not promising by any stretch, extensive trauma, and perhaps most importantly unknown “downtime” (referencing the period where the patient received no basic care like...
-
260.
The Ethics of Teaching Hospitals
I can’t imagine what the patient was thinking. Seeing my trembling hands approaching the lacerations on his face with a sharp needle. I tried to reassure him that I knew what I was doing, but the...
-
260.
Conscious Conversation: Behavioral Science
Dr. Eran Zaidel is a professor of Behavioral Neuroscience and faculty member at the Brain Research Institute at UCLA. His work focuses on hemispheric specialization and interhemispheric interaction...
-
260.
Progress Report
Two years down, I’m still going. The next two years are my clinical rotations, the actual hands-on training. It’s a scary prospect, responsibilities and such; but it’s equally exciting, after...
-
260.
Why Medical School Should Be Free
There’s a lot of really great doctors out there, but unfortunately, there’s also some bad ones. That’s a problem we don’t need to have, and I think it’s caused by some problems with the...
-
260.
The Cerebellum: a model for learning in the brain
I know, it’s been a while. Busy is no excuse though, as it is becoming clear that writing for erraticwisdom was an important part of exercising certain parts of my brain that I have neglected...
-
260.
Conscious Conversation: Philosophy
Daniel Black, author of Erectlocution, was kind enough to chat with me one day and we had a great discussion – have a listen.
-
260.
The Stuff in Between
I’m actually almost normal when not agonizing over robot production details, and quite a bit has happened since I last wrote an update. First, I’ve finally graduated. I had a bit of a...
Comments
See also linguistic cognition.
See also Elizabeth Loftus.
See also superstition.
I have to say, it’s fun watching someone discover psychology for the first time.
Jonathan Dobres
Mar 21, 10:57 AM #
One thing that’s really neat is how when I’m half asleep (usually in the morning), my dreams incorporate things that happen in my surroundings, such as noises. It’s almost as if our minds TiVo and freeze time to incorporate the real time sound into the dream a bit later.
Atul
Mar 21, 01:59 PM #
It’s fairly hard to say if the activation synthesis hypothesis is fully correct though, or if it’s really more orderly than it seems.
Case in point: how many people have recurrent dreams? Therefore how can it be truly random?
Eric. I
Mar 21, 02:12 PM #
Some of those are very interesting, thanks.
Atul: I know what you mean…I’ve had some weird dreams resulting from the music that my cell phone plays as my alarm.
Eric:
“Case in point: how many people have recurrent dreams? Therefore how can it be truly random?”
How many people go through the same routine every day?
Thame
Mar 21, 06:04 PM #
The theory also doesn’t answer why our sleep progresses in stages, which is very interesting when you think about it.
I do think that the theory is pointed in the right direction; it might just take a while to work out the details – we don’t even truly know how memory is stored yet.
Eric. I
Mar 21, 08:01 PM #
Tarun
Mar 22, 03:02 AM #
It’s true that we can’t “predict” dreams based on daily activities, but the theory states that sometimes, the events we experience in our dreams are tied to our daily experiences. If our daily experiences are generally the same, it is possible to have recurring dreams.
Also, I don’t think sleeps stages are within the scope of this theory. Although it seems that most people dream during REM sleep (or recall their dreams more clearly when awakened during REM sleep), people also dream in other stages of sleep. I don’t think any theory of dreams also aims to explain sleep stages.
“I do think that the theory is pointed in the right direction; it might just take a while to work out the details – we don’t even truly know how memory is stored yet.”
Yeah, even if we were to understand dreams, there is so much stuff that we have no clue about.
Tarun: We were kinda disussing that right now :D
Thame
Mar 22, 05:56 PM #
1) The reticular formation in the brainstem definitely controls arousal: in activation-synthesis theory the random firings emerge from the brainstem (if I recall correctly).
2) I assume that the frontal lobe interprets signals from the rest of the brain and here is where “I” experience things.
3) I assume that memory resides in every neuron, most likely at the synapses.
So far i’m pretty much decribing the activation-synthesis theory. The brainstem fires, others neurons in other areas fire and the frontal lobe interprets – everything is wonky because there’s no outside sensory input and yet the brainstem is still “switched on”.
Here’s some questions: why does REM sleep rebound after sleep deprivation or intense studying sessions? I can’t fit it into the theory.
Why do young children have proportionately more REM sleep in a night (even when total sleep is around 12h)?
If the brainstem is “switched on”, then why does it change its concerto throughout the night to certain distinct stages (I know I already mentioned this)?
Is there some active, intelligent information processing going on from the day before as evidence suggests?
This one’s disturbing and I apologize: why do males always have an erection during REM sleep? Possibly some relation to the reticular formation?
... I’m not really getting at anything. I just wanted to put some questions out there that just popped into my head. I do like the idea about active processing of information but maybe that’s just wishful thinking.
Eric. I
Mar 22, 08:22 PM #
Err… sorry. Missed that. :o
Tarun
Mar 23, 09:11 AM #
“So far i’m pretty much decribing the activation-synthesis theory. The brainstem fires, others neurons in other areas fire and the frontal lobe interprets.”
Yes, I think the activity initiates at the pons and I can imagine it confuses the hell out of the frontal lobe (or whatever is processing things) because there is not actual sensory input.
REM sleep is definitely still a mystery and seems to be one of the most important stages of sleep. In addition to the research you mentioned, people consistently awakened during REM sleep report feeling less rested and more irritable than people awakened the same number of times in NREM sleep.
Also, the fact that males almost always have erections during REM sleep is interesting (in addition to it being a really weird idea to discuss in a blog comment :D) because the body is otherwise completely “paralyzed”.
“I’m not really getting at anything. I just wanted to put some questions out there that just popped into my head. I do like the idea about active processing of information but maybe that’s just wishful thinking.”
I like that idea. It’s easier to work with concepts once we have them clearly laid out in front of us.
Tarun:
“Err… sorry. Missed that. :o”
Get with the program man :D
Thame
Mar 23, 08:22 PM #
Some years ago I had a lucid dream. The content of the dream was trivial: I was, in my dream, lying in my bed searching for a lost ticket in the folds of my sheets. However, the atmosphere of the dream was powerful and I woke in a strange state of mind. I had a very strong conviction that something was happening at that moment to someone close to me. I guessed that it was something to do with my girlfriend as she was prone to strange experiences herself. I felt helpless that I could do nothing about it, (she lived several miles away and this was before mobile phones!) and all I could do was get up, put the light on, and make a note of the time – 2:30am.
I awoke the next morning and went downstairs, my parents had left me note: “Your sister gave birth to a son at 2:30 this morning”. She lived on the other side of the country and I hadn’t been aware that she was due.
It’s easy to rationalise such stories, (‘He must have known she was due’, ‘Coincidences are statistically inevitable’, ‘He’s exaggerating because he likes to think of himself as psychic’, and so on), but I just want to say this: in trying to understand the nature or mechanics of dreaming I think we shouldn’t limit ourselves to textbooks and theories – often the most interesting and illuminating information comes from asking non-academic people about their own experiences.
But I repeat: the links between psychology and neurology are fascinating!
Tom
Mar 26, 07:02 AM #
They are, and that’s an amazing story Tom and I never really know what to think when I hear things like this.
I definitely don’t doubt your story or its obvious connections, but what the hell does it mean? How do things like this fit into science?
Thame
Mar 26, 03:07 PM #
I had a similar dream experience in which I found a parakeet, (used to have them as pets), and at some point in the dream somebody mentioned that it was a male. That morning, my brother called me to tell me that my sister’n’law had a baby (more than a week early), and sure enough it was a boy.
It still freaks me out, but in a good way,
Atul
P.S. I’m watching a CNN specials on dreams right now.
Atul
Mar 26, 10:45 PM #
Colleen
Mar 27, 03:22 PM #
Thame
Mar 28, 06:11 AM #
The following paper (brand new research) indicates that information processing occurs automatically in the brain even when awake. It’s a neat idea to think that sleep is linked to the same kind of function by strengthening our memories.
Offline Persistence of Memory-Related Cerebral Activity during Active Wakefulness
Could this mechanism temporarily store information while awake until we are asleep and can store it better?
Eric. I
Mar 29, 02:35 PM #
Thank you for this wonderful article that generates such great discussion. The personal study of dreams & lucid dreaming is a great passion of mine; however, I’ve yet to dwelve too far into many theories of dreaming so I appreciate this information on Activation Synthesis. I’m familiar with this idea (though not the name) but I’m skeptical of explaining away dreams in there entirety by this theory.
Lucid dreaming endlessly fascinates me. I was fortunate enough to actually have one this morning after waking up, recalling all my dreams, and then going back to sleep. (AKA WBTB: Wake Back to Bed Method.) The lucid dream was short and mostly trivial, but fascinating nevertheless!
It’s nice to see lucid dreaming mentioned in the context of such a high quality, professional blog. Keep it up. I really enjoy what you’re doing here.
Ben
Jun 12, 12:48 PM #
To me, the most interesting thing about dreams is not their content, but in how we react to them when we wake up. We learn more about ourselves that way than trying to guess what they mean—which is actually just our reaction to them anyway.
c
Jul 4, 09:07 AM #
Add a Comment
Phrase modifiers:
_emphasis_
*strong*
__italic__
**bold**
??citation??
-
deleted text-@code@
Block modifiers:
bq. Blockquote
p. Paragraph
Links:
"linktext":http://example.com